Last year, when I was originally supposed to set up my blog, I had the opportunity to talk to Trevor Delaney former editor of Small Firm, Inc., an ALM publication about the law firm marketing, specifically what problems and issues firms have around marketing.
Here is part of that q/a.
1. What are some of the biggest issues facing small law firms?
TD: A key issue for many small firm lawyers is — and I imagine always will be — how they can most effectively market their firm. Not surprisingly, the struggle largely stems from time management issues. Attorneys want to know how they can most effectively utilize their marketing time and dollars. Because there is no magic formula whereby attorneys would be guaranteed results, it just makes the decision making that much harder.
Add to the mix, blogging, podcasting and other ways that the Internet can be used to develop new business and it becomes abundantly clear that marketing can be a complex decision. Ultimately, it’s a matter of weighing the nature of the practice, the expense, and what marketing efforts the attorney can be enthusiastic about. E.g., sending out a firm newsletter is only effective if there’s someone committed to making it work, each and every time.
2. As far as resistance towards marketing and business development, what changes have you seen during the life of “Small Firm Inc” ?
TD While working on Small Firm Business, my sense was the more lawyers were trying to figure out ways to make marketing a more planned aspect of their business plan. Initially as I began to talk with lawyers, many seemed to take an ad hoc approach to marketing. E.g., an attorney might give a speech or make a presentation if the opportunity crossed her desk.
Increasingly I’m hearing about lawyers taking a more proactive approach, and taking the time to fill in some of the obvious gaps in their approach to marketing. For instance, I think over time you’ll see more small firms set up a Web page. I’m still surprised by the number of firms that don’t, because the Net has become the starting point for so many of us in any kind of purchase we might consider making.
3. Owning a law firm is really having three businesses, finding, minding and grinding the business. Where in your experience have you seen significant strides made.
TD: Our focus at Small Firm Business was really on the finding and minding stages. Finding relates to all of the points mentioned above. Re: minding, I think the key issue there is the application of technology. Lawyers have to determine which applications might actually benefit their practice and improve client service. There are a tremendous number of tech “bells & whistles” being sold, but not all of them are of universal appeal. Also weighing on a firm’s tech decisions are pressures from both the client and peer firms.
Clients will expect firms to have certain tech capabilities, particularly corporate clients. Firms also need to be mindful of what competing firms are doing on the tech front, lest they appear to be outmoded and somehow unable to serve clients as effectively. Something to watch in the next few years will be the rollout of Windows Vista. While there’s no real expectation that many small firms will upgrade immediately, there may come a time when it becomes clear that the upgrade will have to be made. This may mean that firms that don’t time their upgrade correctly might run into glitches in their client service.
4. Do you see any generational differences towards marketing. (For
example younger crowd a lot more open to marketing than those who are 60+ and set in their ways)
TD:There may be some older attorneys who still object to marketing as somehow being inappropriate for a lawyer, but I think most have come around and at the very least understand that things have changed.
Though this doesn’t mean that they’re becoming bloggers, instead they’re pursing more traditional marketing. I tend to see marketing as more of a personality issue rather than a generational one. We all know some people who appear to be “born marketers.” And that’s in no way pejorative. What I think it means is that there’s a certain comfort level and confidence that comes across when speaking to these people.
At the same time, some people are uncomfortable talking about themselves if it seems like it could be self-interested. So I think lawyers have to assess what their strengths are, and what their comfort zone is. Partners in a small firm could play off of one another’s strengths to see that their firm gets the most exposure in a way that everyone supports and no one dreads.
A heartfelt thank you to Trevor Delaney for doing the interview. Currently he is the Personal Finance editor at Black Enterprise.
Recent Comments